|
Something I thought of last night. I have heard it mentioned that the NHLPA are trying to "take a stand" here on principles. Basically, giving a 24% rollback of their salary during the last lockout, and then the Owners want a further rollback this time. They're worried that at the expiration of each CBA that the owners are going to want another rollback.
Can't it just be put into some sort of provisioning that if the League and PA agree on an even split of 50/50 that that number can't be reduced any further, regardless of CBA's expiring?
|