View Single Post
09-16-2012, 10:18 PM
Registered User
Jaded-Fan's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 34,630
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Ogrezilla View Post
I think most people in favor of the players are taking that stance with the assumption that the soft cap proposals and anything like it will be dropped by the time an agreement is reached. Basically, they support stronger revenue sharing as the main way to fix the financial issues instead of just taking all of the money to fix it from the players. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
If it ends up being only about revenue sharing, then fine as long as owners can make it work. I know in 2005 there were open books showing 2/3 of teams losing money and about to go under. It would depend on how many teams could not make it where my opinion would fall. By ANY change to the cap AND floor I would have an issue with. And until that actually is off the table, I am squarely in the owner's corner.

Jaded-Fan is online now   Reply With Quote