View Single Post
09-18-2012, 03:39 AM
14s incisor
Registered User
14s incisor's Avatar
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Vancouver Island
Country: Canada
Posts: 628
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by y2kcanucks View Post
Redden's contract is as relevant as other players contracts. What, since it looks bad overpaying for a player based people don't like the example? But if it works in their favor it's ok?
Comparing Enstrom/Wideman/Carle to Edler is for the purpose of showing comparable defenseman and what they have recently signed for.

EVERY contract is a risk. To bring up Redden's contract just because it is an example one that backfired has no more significance to Edler's situation than it does to any other big-money UFA signing.

Enstrom/Wideman/Carle are all examples of defenders similar in stats/age/skill to Edler--hell, Edler is actually younger and better than all three--and they all signed contracts within the last year. Those players/contracts are far more comparable to Edler's than Redden's.

14s incisor is online now   Reply With Quote