In (Partial) Defense Of Scott Howson's Recent Trade History
View Single Post
09-18-2012, 01:12 PM
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Originally Posted by
I only read four comments and they were all positive, so i stopped reading assuming it would only god own hill from there.
to the OP:
Great post. I"m a bit of a closet Blue Jackets fan (everyone loves an underdog) and my take was: At the time of trade, the carter trade was fine, a 40-50 point forward and a first for a consistent 60-80 point forward? not bad.
Then of course, as you stated, it all went to hell. Even at the draft time it was pretty close to a loss, add in the carter issues and yah, it didn't look good.
The LA trade was great. A very good d man and a first for the shell of a 60+ point forward? sign me up. that was a definite "everybody wins" trade.
Finally, the nash trade was not bad. Howson DID shoot himself in the foot by making that trade request public, and probably could have gotten a little bit better, but even then, a very decent return (i'm also an inexplicable fan of Anisimov so i'm a little biased).
Good too see someone sharing the view, though i do think Howson is quite bad as a gm, maybe not due to this string of trades,
but someone must be responsible for the piss poor development rate of their players
In my opinion, the development hasn't been horrible under Howson. Granted, that could be because Doug MacLean makes Howson look like Bill Torrey, but as I look through his record it seems to me that the jury is still out on many picks. Hell, two of his 2007 selections just signed their first NHL contracts this past summer.
Last edited by spiny norman: 09-18-2012 at
. Reason: fixed [/B][/QUOTE]
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by candyman82