View Single Post
09-19-2012, 07:49 PM
Registered User
tyratoku's Avatar
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Grand Forks, ND
Country: United States
Posts: 7,385
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Generic User View Post
Doubt that Chicago falls into Calgary territory.. They have Toews, Kane, Keith, Seabrook, Hossa, Sharp, etc. If they were to trade any one of them, which they might have to, they would get a nice return of young players, picks and cap space.

Calgary has Iginla, Kipper, no centers and a revolving door of other players.
I meant that they are going to become the 90s/early 2000s Calgary. Look at who they had in that time period, and they really did not win anything at all.

Calgary had Fleury, Gilmour, Nieuwendyk, Roberts, MacInnis, Vernon, Suter, Mullen, young Iginla, young Regehr, and the list goes on. Yeah, cool, they had some great players. Some potential hall-of-famers. But they didn't win anything.

The current black hawks are in a similar position, IMO. Toews, Kane, Sharp, Hossa, Keith, Seabrook...I'm sure they'll be competitive for a long time, but I don't see them winning anything with that current lineup.

tyratoku is online now