View Single Post
Old
09-21-2012, 09:30 PM
  #85
mouser
Global Moderator
Business of Hockey
 
mouser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South Mountain
Posts: 9,629
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by naurutger View Post
NHL Lockout Hypocrisy - A Look At The 2012 Free Agency Bonanza

http://www.fiveforhowling.com/2012/9...agency-bonanza
People are missing the point if they think the lockout is because owners are handing out fat contracts and can't control themselves. There is a minimum cap floor teams are required to spend to, possibly the best example I can think of being Florida last year: they had to spend a lot of money to get to floor and probably not all spent that efficiently.

Most owners are going to do what they can within the CBA rules to ice a competitive team. The current cap and spending structure means unless you're a top tier revenue team you'll have to run your franchise at an operating loss to do so. The owners goals for a new CBA are somewhat akin to negotiating an armistace so more teams can be both competitive and profitable at the same time.

Even if the owners won every single goal in a new CBA there will still be owners signing players to huge contracts next summer.

mouser is online now   Reply With Quote