View Single Post
09-24-2012, 07:58 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 985
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Novacane View Post
I'd say Corvo and Pitkanen on the first pairing and Faulk and McBain on the second pairing. I feel like they brought in Corvo to have Faulk focus more on the defensive side of the game, so it would be a huge WTF signing if Corvo was put on the 2nd pairing, imo.

Or I may be completely off base with that assessment and they actually brought in Corvo for what they called his "familiarity with Gleason", in which case I'm scared thinking they want to give Corvo that many mpg.
Wasn't Pitkanen-Corvo a PP disaster the last time we tried it? It seems like it makes perfect sense, but for whatever reason those two didn't click.

In which case, I think we'd see Pitkanen-Faulk and McBain-Corvo. Still two RH on the second unit, but I think that makes more sense than leaving McBain, Corvo, or Faulk off the PP.

Last edited by Chrispy: 09-24-2012 at 01:05 PM.
Chrispy is offline   Reply With Quote