Thread: Proposal: Chicago-Toronto
View Single Post
Old
10-02-2012, 05:12 PM
  #17
Intense Rage
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 796
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leaffan16 View Post
Montador is not CHEAP.

Oduya was a crap #4, Montador is a crap #6. There is a difference. It wasn't a deep draft, and if Montador is=2nd/B-prospect, and you're trying to trade for Connolly, then why is his a 3rd or 4th? I guess Chicago isn't a contender, if you are trying to get him. We would rather get nothing for Connolly than get Montador for Connolly.
Montador is by no means a crap player, he just hasn't been healthy for a while.

As far as the original proposal, Montador's value is low, he needs to return and stay healthy for him to become worth trading for. I don't expect anyone to trade a worthwhile asset for him but I don't think the difference between his value and Connolly's is all that large. Connolly is paid 4.75 to be a #3 center and I believe he did not produce much on the 3rd line either.

Intense Rage is offline   Reply With Quote