View Single Post
Old
10-03-2012, 01:18 AM
  #74
I am the Liquor
Registered User
 
I am the Liquor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sunnyvale
Country: Canada
Posts: 34,284
vCash: 7000
Quote:
Originally Posted by taunting canadian View Post
Actually, if 24 teams with 24 votes are losing money, that's probably good news for the players, who are arguing that the owners have the ability to fix the problem with increased revenue sharing. I'm sure the money-losing teams wouldn't mind increased revenue sharing.

Basically, it supports the idea that the root of any financial problem the NHL has is the disparity in revenue between teams, not the overall revenue/costs, if the league as a whole is profitable but so many teams can't manage. The league has the option of proposing revenue sharing, or simply reducing the cap floor, to solve this problem, if it's really as big a problem as they claim it is.
Or they could de-link the cap from revenues.

Offer them a cap of 30million per team, no cap floor. Maximum salary of 3mill per year/player.

Dont like it, move your wife and kids to Russia and take your chances.

Or go work at Safeway.

I am the Liquor is offline