Thread: Yannick Weber
View Single Post
Old
10-04-2012, 10:34 PM
  #83
Mrb1p
PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
 
Mrb1p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Citizen of the world
Country: Canada
Posts: 20,070
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyingKostitsyn View Post
Yeah, he's 4th in ice time (a few seconds more than Ryan Wilson) on a particularily terrible defense corp.

O'Byrne would be no6 on our team and he likely won't get much better. I'm quite happy we have a very good prospect like Bournival instead.
He'd be our 4th dman. Don't kid yourself.

He's better than Kaberle, Diaz, Emelin, Weber, Bouillon and CIE. He's exactly what we have needed. A big tough rh dman, solid in his own zone.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty Danglez View Post
We don't need depth. We need a top 6 forward and a top 4 defenseman. They only player I can really see filling one of those voids would be mcdonagh. Ryder was too long ago (and he had some up and down seasons)... same goes for beauchemin. The rest we don't really need. A big top 6 winger to play with pleks and a top 4 defenseman to play with markov is what this team needs to make the playoffs
Ya we need depth. In fact, we need BETTER depth.

Prust-Pyatt-White looks alot more ''contender'' than Prust-Noke-White.

O'byrne, LapÓerre/Pyatt, Mcdonagh, Grabovski and Latendresse could all be an upgrade somewhere.

We'd just replace Bouillon, Nokelainen, Kaberle, Eller/DD(Wing..), Armstrong, 13th forward7

67-Grabs-DD
21-14-72
Tender-81-27
8-41/94-32
53

Looks alot better than

67-58-72
27-14-21
armstrong-81-32
8-noke-53

So does
Mcdo-76
79-26
22-20
compared to

26-76
74-79
22-61

This roster is contender like. It sure lacks one more top 6er able to score 60+ but its still a real good team. Look at that defense.


Last edited by Mrb1p: 10-04-2012 at 10:41 PM.
Mrb1p is offline   Reply With Quote