View Single Post
10-06-2012, 10:56 AM
It's Me OilTastic
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: St. Albert, Alberta
Originally Posted by
Im still not sure why people still think Turris > Gagner when Turris has never matched Gagner in the NHL, let alone surpassed him. At what point does his "potential" actually need to show itself?
And no to the OP, Rundblad would be nice, but the Oil need Gagner more. Not to mention Gagner is already a decent #2 C, whereas Rundblad hasnt cracked the NHL yet, and even if he does he isnt a lock to be a #3 D or better
he has yet to show much in the NHL that he's still considered to be..
Turris > Gagner...people have
the best is still to come, where as Gagner has had many 40 + point seasons and people have
that they have seen Gagner's best and he won't get much better...that and the fact Turris was taken so high at #3 overall, there
be something there. of course, Cam Barker was taken 3rd overall too...just sayin'
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by ManByng