Quote:
Originally Posted by BobloblawLeaf
I'm not saying I'm the biggest follower of Detroit's prospects, but if these prospects were in any other organization people would have a way different (lesser) opinion of them. Simply because they're Red Wings prospects, people place a higher value on them than other prospects. None of those prospects are particularly great prospects (IMO of course), but because they're Red Wings prospects people view them differently.
|
This has nothing to do with it. Why is that unless a player improves statistically on here that they are considered "regressing" if they dont improve? Why cant it be a fact that his offense took a small hit or stayed consistent if he re-worked his game? Maybe its also the fact the Griffins roster is pretty weak in terms of quality depth over the years to work with. Ugh