: Value of:
View Single Post
10-09-2012, 07:10 PM
Join Date: May 2012
Originally Posted by
I just don't get it. So your telling me, although good, you still have a 34 yo goalie that you don't need, with a huge salary until he's 40, and the price between him and one of the best scoring wingers of the NHL isn't sliding from a 1st to a third?
I totally give up. I don't ever want to hear that freaken goalies name again. I tried, I've said my piece, I will never put him in a trade scenario again. He's obviously worth way to much for my taste.
1) Luongo's 33.
2) He's probably a better player than Vanek.
3) He's on a much cheaper cap hit than Vanek
4) Why don't we see if Chicago fans are okay with a 2nd instead of a first before blasting me. We need to get future talent to help supplant our core, and currently Chicago has a much better prospect pool than us. It holds more value to us than it does to them, so it makes no sense to include it.
View Public Profile
Vankiller Whale's albums
Find More Posts by Vankiller Whale