: On the Radio:
Botch vs Ferraro arguement (team1040)
View Single Post
10-10-2012, 03:01 PM
Join Date: Mar 2006
Originally Posted by
There is a huge difference between intent to hurt and intent to injure. Anyone who thinks the difference is a contrived invention of players' minds intended to justify their bloodthirstiness is totally out to lunch.
Injury is a potential result of hurting someone. It's just a subset of a whole. Players hit to hurt. No doubt about that. They implicitly accept the potential of injuring someone when they hit to hurt.
What I find more laughable is the enforcer's mentality, that they also adopt a similar rationale that they never really want to see guys get injured when their job is to basically have a fistfight out on the ice.
View Public Profile
Cocoa Crisp's albums
Find More Posts by Cocoa Crisp