Quote:
Originally Posted by topchowda
very strong top 4
but beating out Ballard who gets scratched more then a lottery ticket is not the hardest thing.
Not saying Tanev is bad by any stretch. But Smid is still a better defensemen then Tanev and Petry has also proven more
|
it's hard not to ignore any comments such posters have about the Canucks, because it shows they haven't followed the team in a long time.
You do realize that Ballard wasn't a healthy scratch for even ONE GAME last season, right? Of course you don't. You take the popular criticism that has no basis in reality but because it's a dig (and a completely unfounded one) on a Canucks player, you run with it as if it were fact. Then you base your opinions around this completely faulty logic. It'd be like me saying that Eberle doesn't know how to score goals. If anyone ever says such things about your Oilers players would you take anything else they have to say about the Oilers seriously? It's as easy to see that Eberle is a good scorer not only watching him play but just looking at the score sheet, as it is to know that Ballard is never a healthy scratch, just by watching the team play and looking at the game logs.
Again all this points out is that you don't know what you're talking about and haven't actually bothered to follow the team. So how can anyone take any comments you make about the team or its player seriously when you can't even get simple facts correct?