View Single Post
10-13-2012, 10:17 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 191
vCash: 500
Found the piece to be very heavy on the economics side of things. Almost sounded like a counter-point to the CHLPA. Very little was said (or asked?) about on ice issues. Were there conditions on what they would be willing to talk about? Was the piece designed to be about the economics of an OHL club?
Would have liked to have heard their reasons for letting Debeneham (sp) go. Also, what is their on ice plan going forward? They state that they have been frustrated with the lack of on ice success, but there is no mention of what they think might remedy that.
And was it really necessary to mention Taylor Hall first, as one of the players fans have had the chance to watch over the years. C'mon

Baldy is offline