Knights vs Petes
View Single Post
05-12-2006, 01:52 AM
Join Date: May 2005
Originally Posted by
That wasn't how you meant it. Being happy with the number of games has nothing to do with your personal emotions. It was how pleased or not pleased you were with the decision, which you completely reversed with the Downie incident.
You already quoted me out of context and now you want to tell me what I meant to say? All you can tell me is what you think I meant. And in this particular case you are wrong. Or at the very least you want to twist it around. But I will give you the benefit of the doubt.
Did I want him to get suspended? Of course not. Was I happy to see him get suspended? Of course not for the same reason.
Did I think 2 games was justifiable. Yes. That is why I said it first.
Did I think 4 games was too many. Yes. And I explained why after that.
Regarding the Downie decision nothing is "reversed". He should have gotten 2 games just like I thought Bolland should have only gotten two games. That is my position and it is consistent with what I have said.
Last edited by JrHockeyFan: 05-12-2006 at
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by JrHockeyFan