View Single Post
10-16-2012, 06:31 PM
Registered User
flyershockey's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,056
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Cheesesteak Invictus View Post
Not really. The have-nots could actually be compensated for the cap space they don't use by a team that needs more. Without a cap that wouldn't happen.

This would definitely make trade deadlines a lot more interesting.
But wouldn't it eliminate the even playing field that the league has wanted since the last lockout? Big market teams will trade for small market team's cap space. Or am I missing something here?

flyershockey is online now