View Single Post
10-17-2012, 02:58 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,329
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by WantEggRoll View Post
Sorry if you could clarify this for me. How does a business deciding to limit its costs go against competitive conduct? By those same standards teams like Nashville with an internal budget are displaying anti-competitive conduct by not spending with the big boys, even though doing so would cause them to go bankrupt.
It is anti-competitive simply because a salary cap prevents/throttles a player from realizing his real market value.

It is why players have decertified their union when lockouts occur, to enable the filing of anti-trust suits.

Nashville isn't violating the rules of the CBA (Cap ceiling & floor) and if they did you can be assured the NHLPA would be on it in a NY minute.

Last edited by Holdurbreathe: 10-17-2012 at 03:10 PM.
Holdurbreathe is offline