View Single Post
10-18-2012, 12:16 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,869
vCash: 500
I like most of the leagues implemented rules for exp the crazy long term contracts and the front and back loaded contracts, but the league has to look in the mirror ask why we are forcing hockey were it is not profiting. Does it benefit the game as a whole? Does it increase interest in America as a whole to than increase profits in other areas like televesion. I dont think so, i think team like Philly, Pit, Nyr can generate televesion interests and sell the game. So why do we need to cling to non-profiting teams. Saying that rule changes still should be imlemented because there are teams that are not losing, but are not making a great deal, and this is were it is important.

satrabyk is offline   Reply With Quote