View Single Post
10-18-2012, 08:44 AM
Registered User
turkinaa's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: PA
Country: United States
Posts: 915
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by DrinkFightFlyers View Post
Your post seemed to insinuate that the CBA would be considered an ex post facto law and the subsequent post of another mentioned the constitutionality of ex post facto laws. I was simply clarifying that the CBA would not be violating the Ex Post Facto Clause because the CBA is not a law. Wanted to make sure everyone was up to date on their constitutional law. Haha.
No sorry for the confusion.

I doubt it. Maybe some middle-of-the-road players and some scrubs, but I doubt Yakupov or any other young guys bail to Europe.
I cannot wait for a counter proposal to see this clause get removed, or at least modified in some way to not affected current contracts - as well as other things. I just hate dwelling on something that might not be an issue in a few days or weeks.

turkinaa is offline