View Single Post
10-18-2012, 02:41 PM
Bleed Ranger Blue
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,811
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by HatTrick Swayze View Post
Honest question - why should it matter how the Rangers became one of the league's biggest earners? At the end of the day, they are, period. At the end of the day, the amount of visibility they bring to the sport and the amount of money they have and will increasingly contribute in revenue sharing benefits all teams.

With that luxury comes the ability to pay for world class travel accommodations, practice facilities, medical treatments, and scouting & development programs. Those are all significant advantages the Rangers have over smaller market teams. Should they be capped and regulated based on what the worst-off teams can afford?

If we are talking strictly about competitive balance on the ice, what really matters is the amount of cap dollars teams can spend in their NHL lineups. And in that instance, the rules are the same for all.
I am talking about the on-ice product. The rest is apples and oranges.

Since the NHL became a cap leagued 7 years ago, I think its silly that fortunate teams like the Rangers can play roulette with their free agent contracts. It doesnt benefit anyone, including the Rangers.

Bleed Ranger Blue is offline   Reply With Quote