View Single Post
10-18-2012, 07:05 PM
seventieslord's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Regina, SK
Country: Canada
Posts: 28,439
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by vadim sharifijanov View Post
seems to me if people are going to do year-by-year comparisons, then it needs to be on a sliding scale. say, best two or three years (peak) are weighted by five; prime years (say, next three to five) are weighted by three; next handful (early/late) weighted by two; anything else (longevity bonus) weighted by one. those numbers i just came up with off the top of my head, but something like that makes me most sense to me.
That's basically what I did, except I am more longevity-friendly.

seventieslord is offline   Reply With Quote