View Single Post
10-20-2012, 12:41 PM
Registered User
racerjoe's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,098
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by jumptheshark View Post

in the deal that was last put forward Both fan basis are rejecting the trade mostly due to the addition of each of the said d-men that have been added to the deal and the discussion is about what each brings to the table and how a change of teams could help either one? But we can not discuss that?

As I said, adding those two to the deal is a push, both are on bad contracts for what they are doing and it is a question to be asked who has the worse contract based upon performance over the past two seasons
If we are discussing the two, I think Ballard is just on a bad contract for what he is doing, still a solid defence man. He could still play top four if needed, especially in the right system with the right role. Where Komi has fallen of the map, maybe he will bounce back, but he was hardly an NHL dman last year on a pour defensive team.

racerjoe is offline