View Single Post
10-23-2012, 08:11 PM
PG Canuck
PG Canuck's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Prince George, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 21,176
vCash: 50
Originally Posted by billvanseattle View Post
Is anyone seriously saying that the 5+ year deal applies to exisitng contracts? I doubt that is the intention.
Don't understand why it would apply to current contracts either, otherwise the GM's that dished out those deals wouldn't have in the first place probably. Also, I don't think just bringing in a new rule that applies to already existing contracts isn't fair, as that wasn't in the last CBA which was when the existing contracts were signed under, not this proposed one; so why should GM's be punished with having a new 5+ year deal that didn't even exist at that time?

PG Canuck is offline