2012-13 Lockout Discussion Part V: The "Back to square one" Edition
View Single Post
10-26-2012, 10:32 AM
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Jersey
Being willing to lose games and willing to lose games are two different things. Maybe that isn't intent, but it is a damning implication to accuse a side of wanting to miss games.
I know it's Bettman's playbook to negotiate this way. I take issue with him acting like a brat when someone does it to him. He fashions himself as a hockey world wide representative. He represents 4 owners.
Important questions: Who appoints the negotiating committee? Does this committee have to present all offers to the owners, or do they get to yay/nay deals that get passed on?
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by DutchShamrock