2012-13 Lockout Discussion Part V: The "Back to square one" Edition
View Single Post
10-26-2012, 01:08 PM
Change is good.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brooklyn of course
Originally Posted by
I do not view it as an inflexibility. They want to get paid the money that the owners signed them. I look at it as the owners inflexibility to pay the money that they signed the players for.
There is nothing wrong with phasing in the 50/50 while the existing contracts get paid.
To which the owners can say "we don't want to sign a new CBA." The latter obviously proceeds from the former since that's where we are.
I'm merely pointing out what will be required in order to get to the deal done.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by BrooklynRangersFan