View Single Post
10-26-2012, 02:19 PM
Riche16's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: FL
Country: United States
Posts: 3,433
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by haohmaru View Post
I actually think it was deliberate by the NHL to demonstrate what their share was the final year of this last CBA (57% players/43% owners). I get that it's a big disparity from what was, but how is 43% insulting to the players and not to the owners who actually lived with that % for a year?
Bingo. I posted almost this exact thing a few pages back. The offer, while deemed a "smack in the face" was a calculated step. Showing how ridiculously skewed those percentages were. It was antagonistic, but very calculated.

Riche16 is offline