2012-13 Lockout Discussion Part V: The "Back to square one" Edition
View Single Post
10-27-2012, 11:10 AM
Join Date: Aug 2008
Originally Posted by
Right now they own empty buildings. Signing someone to a contract whether it is someone to paint your house or skate for your hockey team puts obligations on both parties. The one party does not 'own' the other party and being fabulously wealthy doesn't entitle someone to change the terms of agreements that they've made just because they want to.
I hate arguing for the owners. So I'm going to stop. It's crap either way. Both sides are wrong, spiteful, greedy a-holes.
But every contract signed is subject to the CBA. Both parties negotiated and signed contracts (some just before the CBA expired) knowing FULL WELL that those contracts will be subject to the new CBA.
They both understood what they were doing. That's why they're both wrong.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Riche16