View Single Post
Old
10-27-2012, 03:46 PM
  #53
RobertKron
Registered User
 
RobertKron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,416
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahmon View Post
While its almost impossible to acquire an elite dman in his prime.

I agree with Alflives. Canucks lack that dman that can play 30 mins and be a force in all areas of the game.

I've said this many times, canucks defense is so inconsistent because the top 4 dmen, at least 2 of them is inconsistent.

Still the canucks need more/better top 6 forwards.
I just don't really understand the point of the constant griping on here about this. The Canucks are almost certainly not going to add an established, win-now 30min guy through a trade without it being a net negative for the team due to the pieces they'd have to give up. They don't draft very high, and are unlikely to get a right-now impact guy in the draft. It's just the reality of the situation.

Yeah, they should be looking at their options, but you also can't become so fixated on the one mythical thing that you ignore everything else, which is what some folks seem to be demanding.

How many guys in the league are we even talking about here? Like, serious, established elite #1 guys that will carry your team for 30 mins a game to the cup?


Last edited by RobertKron: 10-27-2012 at 03:53 PM.
RobertKron is offline   Reply With Quote