Blinkage, Linkage & Stinkage (CBA & Lockout Discussion) XVII
View Single Post
10-27-2012, 11:03 PM
Join Date: Sep 2008
Originally Posted by
These comments are so funny. If it was 2004 it was Goodenow instead of Fehr. But we all know how that turned out right.
the truth is Bettman has done more to unify this union than Fehr.
Yes: The players lost an entire season because they wouldn't accept any proposal with a salary cap. They eventually accepted a salary cap the next offseason after firing Goodenow, which has led them to record incomes in recent seasons.
The same thing is happening this time: the players will eventually sign for something like the owners are offering now; whether an entire season is lost due to their stupidity or not is the only question.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by CpatainCanuck