View Single Post
10-28-2012, 09:44 PM
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,760
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Peter Puck View Post
Many posters here have said that Burke has greatly improved our prospects. I have always wondered a bit about this. We always overrate our current prospects. But maybe he really has restocked our cupboards.

But when I look back at the 2008 HF team prospects ranking I see we were ranked 17th in the league. In the most recent HF rankings we are 18th. Can anyone explain to me why it seems be be generally accepted that Burke has vastly improved our prospect pool but HF thinks we have slipped (one spot) in the rankings.

I guess the current rankings were before the draft.
1) All last season many people were claiming our prospects were already much better.
2) Did adding Reilly (and our other picks) really improve us that much?
Congratulations You've just debunked one of the MANY myths perpetrated around here by Burke supporters.

Outside of Reilly we have no elite Talent - similar to the crop of players we had way back when.

DaveT83* is offline