View Single Post
Old
10-29-2012, 04:55 AM
  #217
Acallabeth
Play fair, post fair
 
Acallabeth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Kemerovo, Russia
Country: Russian Federation
Posts: 4,126
vCash: 500
Send a message via Skype™ to Acallabeth
Quote:
Originally Posted by Incognito View Post
That's great, but it still doesn't mean he was the better player. Crosby had equally impressive numbers and would have matched Ovechkin's trophy case if it weren't for the injury troubles he ran into. Even so, an Art Ross, a Rocket Richard, a Hart, a Lester B. Pearson, a Stanley Cup and an Olympic Gold Medal is nothing to sneeze at.
Nobody says Crosby's bad.

OK, we can look at it from the other point:
2005-6 - Ovechkin wins the Calder over Crosby.
2006-7 - Obviously a better year from Crosby: Art Ross, Hart, Pearson.
2007-8 - Ovechkin's answer: Art Ross, Hart, Pearson + Richard.
2008-9 - Both outscored by Malkin, but AO wins Hart, Pearson, Richard again. Playoff showdown is won by the Pens, but Ovy and Sid were probably equal (AO was the leading scorer, however). The Pens win the Cup.
2009-10 - Both outscored by Henrik and even tied in points (Ovechkin missed 10 games, but he's to blame mostly. Also a crazy +45). Ovechkin wins Lindsay.

We can say whatever we want, but Crosby only outplayed Ovechkin in one of their 1st 5 years. I think AO is by a little, but clearly ahead.

My post is indeed an opinion, but to say Ovechkin was never on Crosby's level is just silly.
And some guys even mention Stamkos...

Acallabeth is offline