View Single Post
10-29-2012, 08:38 AM
Dennis Bonvie
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Connecticut
Country: United States
Posts: 12,241
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Sentinel View Post
I could never understand this "all or nothing," take-to-the-absurd approach. Of course there should be players from the past eras! And it's possible that there was equal number of geniuses from each decade that stood head and shoulders above their peers (possibly more in the expansion era). But it doesn't mean every era must be represented equally.
I will agree with you that there are too many pre-1950 players on the list. But not to the extent that you would like to dismiss them.

Basically most voters here look at the pre-1950 players much as you look at Russian player. If we has a list of say 7 or 8 more Russians replacing pre-50 players, the outrage would be pretty much like your own.

Dennis Bonvie is offline