Why Paul Kelly thinks expansion would help end NHL lockout
View Single Post
10-30-2012, 02:33 PM
Join Date: Dec 2011
Originally Posted by
Which is why I think this lockout is going horribly. Not because the two sides aren't talking, or are far apart. They're not talking and are far about about THE WRONG ISSUE.
It doesn't matter if we have teams in Hamilton, Quebec, Seattle or wherever. Because if they go through with their payroll tied to average revenue plan, PIT, OTT, WIN, MIN, SJ, LA, and EDM are going to join the list of have nots by 2020. We'll have 11 good markets and 19 ones that are struggling to keep up.
Yes, but as we've discussed before, it would mean a shift in HRR to use the median revenue... which means a decrease in HRR, which Fehr would never ever accept. They might have been able to get that initially, but to try to do that now will not work.
I've been looking for trouble... but trouble hasn't been cooperating!
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Riptide