So who is bummed about the lockout? II
View Single Post
10-30-2012, 05:21 PM
Join Date: May 2010
Originally Posted by
also this isn't a fight, but is there a clear sense of the whole "make whole" provision, since the common belief is its coming from the players future share and not the owners, is there any clear evidence that that is false? again all i've seen is that is going to come from players future shares, i just want to get that straight not accusing or fighting for one or the other.
From the perspective that the 7% of the greater than 50% the players get now would go to the owners in a 50/50 split, one could argue that the make whole provision, without any other wording, would be "players paying players".
However, the wording was a bit vague to me on that. It also could be interpreted that the make whole provision would have dropped the players share of a greater than X revenue calculation down to 48.5% to cover the make whole provisions.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by bozak911