View Single Post
Old
11-01-2012, 09:07 PM
  #152
TheDevilMadeMe
Global Moderator
 
TheDevilMadeMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Country: United States
Posts: 37,269
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SaintPatrick33 View Post
Ok, so what's the alternative? Using raw data instead of adjusted stats seems to me to result in two conclusions: Either players' offensive numbers from prior to 67-68 and after 92-93 are brushed aside because they significantly inferior to the numbers put up between 67-68 and 92-93 OR we can't compare players from different eras at all because it's apples and oranges. Neither seems to me to be a very satisfactory answer.
The best alternative would be for the hockey stats community to thoroughly evaluate and improve on H-R's basic adjusted stats.

Until then, I think rankings and percentages are superior to adjusted stats for evaluating top players.

TheDevilMadeMe is offline   Reply With Quote