Adjusted stats - how valuable?
View Single Post
11-01-2012, 10:07 PM
Join Date: Aug 2006
Originally Posted by
Ok, so what's the alternative? Using raw data instead of adjusted stats seems to me to result in two conclusions: Either players' offensive numbers from prior to 67-68 and after 92-93 are brushed aside because they significantly inferior to the numbers put up between 67-68 and 92-93 OR we can't compare players from different eras at all because it's apples and oranges. Neither seems to me to be a very satisfactory answer.
The best alternative would be for the hockey stats community to thoroughly evaluate and improve on H-R's basic adjusted stats.
Until then, I think rankings and percentages are superior to adjusted stats for evaluating top players.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by TheDevilMadeMe