View Single Post
Old
11-02-2012, 01:09 PM
  #672
tarheelhockey
Global Moderator
 
tarheelhockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Triangle
Country: United States
Posts: 30,434
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plan The Parade View Post
In this lockout, the PA has already agreed that 50% is where we need to be. The only difference is how to get there: the PA wants to go there gradually and keep the current players' share intact while the NHL wants to be there right now (now? NOW! Well, when will then be now? SOON!) and compensate by roll back players' salaries.
The problem is that the NHLPA is only willing to back down to 50% it it happens just before the end of the CBA, contingent upon high revenue growth, and with their current 57% intact for the near future.

Which is to say, they're not really agreeing to 50%. They're simply including that number in the proposal because it would look unreasonable to continue to still be using 57% this late in the game. But they have yet to present a proposal that includes a guaranteed reduction in salary any time soon.

tarheelhockey is offline   Reply With Quote