View Single Post
Old
11-02-2012, 06:29 PM
  #78
mossey3535
Registered User
 
mossey3535's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,903
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Jackson View Post
That's fair. Again, this has to be considered a positive step, but until we have few more details, we shouldn't be shouting that the PA "has to" agree to it.

It could well be that the owners have agreed to "make whole", but also want to redefine HRR. Who knows?

We should get an indication which way this is going by early next week.
The NHL has already given up on HRR definitions. The only reason they wanted clarification is because the NHLPA ambushed them on the Nashville and Phoenix public subsidies being put into HRR. They gave up on that, too.

This is a last-ditch effort. I don't think they'll put in a major issue like that, especially now that they've seen how the PA has spun the HRR thing.

mossey3535 is online now