: Value of:
Getzlaf and/or Perry as rentals.
View Single Post
11-02-2012, 08:39 PM
Join Date: Sep 2011
Originally Posted by
No flame, but Rangers have to be careful to have $$ to sign guys + likely to make it prospects.
Ergo, instead of moving multiple bodies for 1, which may be ok for another day, would prefer
ASSUMING THE NMC WE ALL KNOW ABOUT IS WAIVED
to do something around Richards + not much else for Getzlaf and not much else
Why the ducks? 'cause they get ballpark Getz talent locked up for 4-5 years +, and if he gets old after that quickly can probably get either a buyout or in a future CBA an amnesty for the balance.
Why the rangers? 'cause they upgrade on a top guy with a short term commitment, so they have lots of room again for all the developing guys and the mostly younger guys they are keeping. (Keeping them all for as long as possible enhances best options for best trade scenarios when it does come time to move 2 for 1, 3 for 1.)
Again, don't expect any of this, but the thread topic is value of Getzlaf + Perry
So I consider this in line with that.
Why in the hell would the Ducks veer do this?
If we lose Perry and Getzlaf why would we want to get older? Retarded
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Gliff