View Single Post
Old
11-02-2012, 10:18 PM
  #218
Kirk Muller
Registered User
 
Kirk Muller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Brrr -18, Gomez Cold
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,293
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Some Other Flame View Post
You understand that the PA was proposing to have the old CBA extended for a year? And if the league was that concerned about a strike, they could have asked the PA to sign a non-strike agreement. If the union refused, then you could say a strike was a possibility.
again, of course they wanted to extend it. They have profited heavily off it. It was 57% to 43% in their favor. If they think that was so fair, why didnt they propose to play with the same percentages but in the owners favor until the deal was done.

Why do you think its the players right to play and negotiate if the owners feel its detrimental to them?

I can easily flip this and say, why dont the players offer to play with a no strike agreement? They havent done that because it reduces their leverage. So i guess you cant say that a strike isnt possible because the players never offered it.

Kirk Muller is offline