View Single Post
11-03-2012, 12:53 AM
Join Date: Sep 2007
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,741
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Fugu View Post
Because that's not what I was talking about in the post you quoted. If you want to spring off to another direction, don't make it look like that's where I was headed. It was your implication, not mine.
It's just about about a little wiggle here and a little wiggle there.

Are you guys reading this from a script?

This is your post - are you implying that the NHL has not given the NHLPA what they have been looking for, which is the covering of contracts out of the owners percentage of the HRR?

Again, a little wiggle here and there is how negotiations are resolved. There is no fish involved.

I asked if you had information that contradicted the quotes from the NHL since you immediately posted a negative retort. If the statements are incorrect, let us know. I want to hear if the NHLPA has stated they believe that the NHL statements were nothing more than rhetoric from a "script".

Lobotomizer* is offline