View Single Post
Old
11-03-2012, 02:51 PM
  #63
Cogburn
Registered User
 
Cogburn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,363
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1972 View Post
how did Hossa not get that?

Armstrong was a top 9 foward at the time, and Esposito was a very good prospect at the time, not the same but close
What's wrong with Schroeder?

Raymond (top 9 forward), Jensen+2nd or Schroeder+1st or Gaunce+2nd, Connauton (higher risk, but much higher reward) or Sauve (our top defensive D prospect with Tanev playing a full role with our team) or Tanev.

That's a top 9 player to eat minutes liberated by Perry being moved, one of our top prospects and a corresponding pick, and either our youngest full time NHLer this season, or one of the two top prospects at that position. Better then 3 firsts, or worse?

I'd want Gillis to be able to talk to Perry prior to the trade to see what his interest would be in resigning.

Cogburn is offline   Reply With Quote