View Single Post
11-03-2012, 04:55 PM
Registered User
SJeasy's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Jose
Country: United States
Posts: 12,538
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by mouser View Post
He has been "going after the cap" the whole time. If they kept everything in the last CBA identical except threw away the cap ceiling and floor then the players would have received the exact same amount of $ at the end of the day. With huge escrow clawbacks of course.

The cap proper is much less important than the linked % of HRR enforced via the escrow process. I note all the PA proposals have attempted to soften or delink the % of HRR for the majority of the new CBA.

That's the real core issue. The cap itself is secondary, helping to keep the salaries from straying too far from the HRR %.
Bad choice of words on my part. I should have said "linked percentage" and I do believe there is a strong possibility that it is his goal.

SJeasy is offline