View Single Post
Old
11-05-2012, 05:11 PM
  #239
DAChampion
Registered User
 
DAChampion's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Canberra, Australia
Country: Australia
Posts: 6,763
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kriss E View Post
But don't the players want to keep their current contracts? Which ends up not being a 50-50 split?
The CBA would have to converge to a 50/50 split due to the fact the owners signed those contracts. A switch to 50/50 overnight is equivalent to the owners reneging on signed contracts, which is unacceptable.

The last three offers from the players had the convergence in 1, 3, or 5 years. The NHL's official reason for not signing them is that those deals relied on optimistic revenue growth projections, of I think 5%/year but it might be another number. We'll see what the final deal looks like.

ETA: They could just agree to keep the cap flat until revenues grow sufficiently for payroll to be fixed at 50/50, without it being a fixed number of years.


Last edited by DAChampion: 11-05-2012 at 05:19 PM.
DAChampion is online now