View Single Post
11-07-2012, 10:27 AM
Cult of Personality
y2kcanucks's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Surrey, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 46,738
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to y2kcanucks
Originally Posted by Liferleafer View Post
WTF? Was i wrong? You said "see 2006-2007 team. I pulled it from the Hockey site and it didn't look as "sucky" as you said. I'll admit i haven't watched every Canucks game and i didn't say i had any knowledge whatsoever about the Canuck's "situation". So, let me be clear, you would take Hemsky over Kadri or Colborne/Connolly and a 1st?
Yes you are wrong.

Firstly, we didn't finish first overall

The Sedins were just coming into their own and weren't dominant in the regular season. They were good, but weren't viewed as the players they are today.

Linden was a 4th liner. Naslund was a shell of his former self and was more of a detriment to his line than an asset. Morrison wasn't much of an impact player. Edler was a rookie who hardly played. Kesler was a mere third liner. Pyatt was a plug who produced because its hard not to when given first line minutes with the Sedins even before they became elite. This was Bieksa's first full season, and although it was good, the team offensively was lousy.

Luongo carried that team.

And yes. I take Hemsky over Kadri, Colborne, mid 1st.

y2kcanucks is offline