View Single Post
11-07-2012, 02:28 PM
MoreOrr's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mexico
Country: Canada
Posts: 24,651
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by KevFu View Post
My whole issue with this is:

How do you determine Who "sucks because they have no money" versus who "has no money because they suck" ?
If the Salary Floor is sufficient for a well-run team to be competitive, then teams that remain stuck near the Salary Floor and are constant recepients of Revenue sharing are so because they "suck" = are poorly run (or because being competitive doesn't matter because not enough people in the area have an interest in hockey).

MoreOrr is offline   Reply With Quote