Quote:
Originally Posted by KevFu
My whole issue with this is:
How do you determine Who "sucks because they have no money" versus who "has no money because they suck" ?
|
If the Salary Floor is sufficient for a well-run team to be competitive, then teams that remain stuck near the Salary Floor and are constant recepients of Revenue sharing are so because they "suck" = are poorly run (or because being competitive doesn't matter because not enough people in the area have an interest in hockey).