Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohashi_Jouzu
Um... yeah. Tough, as in impossible, imo. Too much career value and excellence relative to his peers under microscopes of varied focal lengths. But I think Yzerman >> Fedorov (where >> implies any great divide, be it 80 arbitrary spots on an all-time ranking list, a skills/2-way play comparison, or whatever) is almost equally ludicrous.
|
Perhaps 80 spots is a bit extreme. Maybe it's more me overrating Yzerman than under rating Fedorov. I could see Yzerman ranked anywhere from top 20 to top 40. I could see, although it would be tough, having Fedorov as high as 70ish and as low as around 100. I think ~40 spots is the absolute smallest distance I could see ranking them.