View Single Post
Old
11-08-2012, 02:17 AM
  #65
Scurr
Registered User
 
Scurr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Whalley
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,408
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SJeasy View Post
They haven't been good since the fanbase caught on to how badly hockeyops was run. Your argument completely overlooks their early success in attendance. This is very tiresome to hear arguments with faulty premises.
Sorry to tire you I don't see how their early attendance effects what I'm saying. Teams usually get a head start with some early buzz and attendance. Since, they've run that team poorly and that has lead to poor attendance and little growth in that market.

San Jose has had success on the ice and drawn pretty well, haven't they?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SJeasy View Post
The other issue is that there are only a handful of markets (mostly Canadian) that can sustain a poor hockeyops side to the org.
Why should a team be able to sustain when it's run poorly? What other business could I run poorly and expect to make money?


Last edited by Scurr: 11-08-2012 at 02:32 AM.
Scurr is offline   Reply With Quote