Tor - Phi
View Single Post
11-08-2012, 11:21 AM
Join Date: Feb 2010
Originally Posted by
No i did not do it based on potential. If i said that then it would be Couturier first line center, and Gardiner top pairing dman.
If that is the case then you are looking at a staal/Richards type package for couturier and a matt carle/Brent burns type package for Gardiner....
When you compare those 2 packages the center proves to be more valuable.
Burns was dealt for a 2nd liner, a top prospect and a late 1st
Richards was dealt for a top prospect and a 2nd liner
Staal was dealt for a top 10 pick, a 3rd liner (with the value of that of a 2nd liner) and a medioocre prospect
Its not that much more valueable, actually you can argue Burns returned the most.
View Public Profile
The Podium's albums
Find More Posts by The Podium